TOTAL VOLUME:
$66b
24H VOL:
$398,877,831
24H TRANSACTIONS:
647,445,881
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,477,629,845
622,934
Markets across
14,083
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
1,257
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
4
Polymarket:
49%
VS.
Kalshi:
51%
Time left: 26d:01h:28m
$
$20
$50
$100
$500
This market tracks who will win the 2026 Men's Wimbledon Singles Tournament. Across Polymarket and Kalshi, the consensus probability for Jannik Sinner to claim the title stands at 63.0%. Resolution will be determined by the official Wimbledon tournament results, with credible reporting as a secondary source. Watch for developments through the tournament window, which runs June 29 through July 12, 2026, with final resolution by July 13, 2026.
Wimbledon 2026 is scheduled for June 29 - July 12, 2026. This market will resolve to the player that wins the 2026 Wimbledon Men’s Singles Tournament. If at any point it becomes impossible for a listed player to win the 2026 Wimbledon Men’s Singles Tournament per the rules of the tournament, the corresponding market will resolve to “No”. If the 2026 Wimbledon Men’s Singles Tournament is cancelled, postponed after August 31, 2026, or there is otherwise no winner declared within that timeframe, this market will resolve to “Other”. The primary resolution source will be official information from Wimbledon (https://www.wimbledon.com/index.html); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Each participant's market outcome resolves to Yes if that player wins the 2026 Wimbledon Men's Singles professional tennis tournament. For any participant who forfeits, withdraws from consideration, or takes official action removing them from tournament eligibility, their corresponding market outcome resolves to No. Resolution is based on the official tournament results and each player's participation status throughout the event.
Prediction markets like those tracked here operate on real-money stakes and continuous order books, often reflecting sharper, more dynamic pricing than traditional sportsbooks. Because traders profit directly from accuracy, odds tend to adjust faster to news, injuries, and form changes. Sportsbooks, by contrast, manage risk and margin differently and may lag behind prediction market consensus. Comparing both sources can reveal value opportunities or confirm where the smart money is positioned.
Kalshi and Polymarket can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, liquidity pools, and fee structures, which naturally creates pricing gaps. Kalshi and Polymarket may also have distinct user bases with varying risk appetites or information access. Arbitrage traders typically narrow these spreads, but temporary divergences persist due to order-book depth, settlement rule clarity, and platform-specific trading dynamics. Monitoring both venues reveals where consensus is strongest.
Major catalysts include player injuries, recent Grand Slam performance, grass-court form leading into the tournament, ranking shifts, and head-to-head matchup draws. Coaching changes, off-court controversies, or unexpected retirements can also swing odds sharply. Tournament seeding and bracket positioning matter once the draw is announced. Real-time match results during the event itself will drive the most dramatic repricing as contenders advance or exit.
Follow the signals, not the noise
Get insights on market conviction, notable shifts, and what the data is quietly signaling.