TOTAL VOLUME:

$150.1b

24H VOL:

$142,857,652

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,859,322,643

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,733,278,615

483,990

Markets across

35,811

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

3,349

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

38%

VS.

Kalshi:

62%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Politics
Will the US acquire part of Greenland in 2026?
opinion
polymarket
limitless

Will the US acquire part of Greenland in 2026?

Total volume:
$11,541,616
Volume 24h:
$549,606
34,705%
Liquidity:
$64,142
28%
Open interest:
$874,089N/A

Will the US acquire part of Greenland in 2026?

all

3 markets

Opinion

Polymarket

Limitless

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolves Dec 31, 2026

Will the US acquire part of Greenland in 2026?

18%chance
Amount

$

Trade on
opinion

Trade on Opinion

At 16.8¢ buys you 595 shares | Odds: 18% Total Payout: $595 | Net Profit: $495 Multiplier: 5.95x | ROI: 495% APY not meaningful 64 days to resolution
You will be redirected to the platform to complete this trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
opinion

Will the US acquire part of Greenland in 2026?

Trade
18%
Yes 16.8¢No 83.2¢
—
N/A
$549,119
0%
N/A
N/A
2mo 4d
active
polymarket

Will the US acquire part of Greenland in 2026?

3%
Yes 3.4¢No 96.9¢
0.3¢
$64,142
$10,992,484
0%
0.25%
N/A
2mo 5d
active
limitless

Will the US acquire part of Greenland in 2026?

3%
Yes 3.3¢No 96.8¢
1.5¢
N/A
$13
0%
0%
N/A
2mo 5d
active
PredictionHero
PH Consensus
3.3%
Yes 7.8¢No 92.3¢
Avg: 0.9¢Max: 1.5¢
Total markets: 3

Intro

This market tracks the probability of the United States acquiring part of Greenland by December 31, 2026. Currently, the consensus probability of this occurring, as aggregated from Opinion, Polymarket, and Limitless, is 17.8%. Resolution will be determined by official information from the governments of the United States, Denmark, and Greenland, supplemented by credible reporting consensus. Keep an eye on potential developments following the Danish parliamentary elections scheduled for any time before June 2027, as the outcome could significantly influence the future of Greenlandic-US relations.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Unified Resolution Criteria (Consistent across platforms)

All platforms share identical criteria: binding legal instruments or force required for sovereignty/jurisdiction transfer, with explicit exclusions for non-binding arrangements and pre-existing control.Primary resolution logic: Official information from the governments of the United States, Denmark, and Greenland; credible reporting consensus may supplement

Core resolution logic:

  • Binding agreement or legal instrument required to transfer sovereignty or establish exclusive U.S. jurisdiction
  • Use of force qualifying if it creates defined U.S. control area
  • Non-binding statements, MOUs, basing rights, leases, and commercial concessions do not qualify
  • Acquisition must occur by December 31, 2026 (effective date after deadline permitted if instrument signed before)

Edge cases & clarifications:

  • Post-deadline effective date: Qualifies if binding instrument is executed before deadline even if transfer takes effect afterward
  • Partial jurisdiction: Qualifies if U.S. gains primary/exclusive control over a defined sub-area where Danish/Greenland authority is removed
  • Force scenario: Military occupation establishing exclusive control meets criteria regardless of legal recognition
Timing: Resolution occurs after December 31, 2026, based on whether qualifying event occurred by that dateOur PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States acquires control of any land territory that is part of Greenland by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. Only the transfer of sovereignty, or the acquisition of primary or exclusive jurisdiction or control qualifies. 1. Transfer of Sovereignty: This will qualify if a binding agreement or legal instrument results in a defined area of Greenland coming under the formal sovereignty of the U.S. (e.g., incorporated as a U.S. state, territory, possession, or other U.S. political classification), even if the effective date occurs after the market deadline. 2. Acquisition of Primary or Exclusive Jurisdiction or Control: This will qualify if a binding agreement or legal instrument establishes a defined area in Greenland in which the U.S. has primary or exclusive jurisdiction or control over the territory, such that the ordinary legal authority of Denmark and Greenland do not apply,except by U.S. permission. Such agreements or instruments will qualify even if the effective date occurs after the market deadline. 3. Use of Force: If the U.S. acquires primary or exclusive jurisdiction or control over a defined area of Greenland through force, this will also qualify. An announcement will qualify only if it is accompanied by or consists of a binding agreement or legal instrument (e.g., enacted legislation, a signed treaty, the signed text of an agreement, or an executive action implementing such an agreement) that unambiguously creates a transfer of sovereignty, or primary or exclusive jurisdiction or control, even if this transfer or acquisition takes effect after the market deadline. Non-binding statements, negotiations, proposals, frameworks, or MOUs will not alone qualify. Basing rights, access agreements, SOFA-type arrangements, COFA-type arrangements, commercial concessions, or other permissions to use land (including leases) will not alone qualify. Any qualifying U.S. jurisdiction or control in Greenland that existed at market creation will not count as new qualifying control. Examples of qualifying events include but are not limited to treaty or piece of legislation that makes any portion of Greenland a U.S. territory or possession, even if the handover date for such territory or possession is later); or, a Guantánamo-style arrangement establishing a defined zone in Greenland under exclusive or primary U.S. jurisdiction and control, where Denmark and Greenland’s ordinary legal authority does not apply except by U.S. permission. The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the governments of the United States, Denmark, and Greenland; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Limitless

This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States acquires control of any land territory that is part of Greenland by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. Only the transfer of sovereignty, or the acquisition of primary or exclusive jurisdiction or control qualifies. 1. Transfer of Sovereignty: This will qualify if a binding agreement or legal instrument results in a defined area of Greenland coming under the formal sovereignty of the U.S. (e.g., incorporated as a U.S. state, territory, possession, or other U.S. political classification), even if the effective date occurs after the market deadline. 2. Acquisition of Primary or Exclusive Jurisdiction or Control: This will qualify if a binding agreement or legal instrument establishes a defined area in Greenland in which the U.S. has primary or exclusive jurisdiction or control over the territory, such that the ordinary legal authority of Denmark and Greenland do not apply,except by U.S. permission. Such agreements or instruments will qualify even if the effective date occurs after the market deadline. 3. Use of Force: If the U.S. acquires primary or exclusive jurisdiction or control over a defined area of Greenland through force, this will also qualify. An announcement will qualify only if it is accompanied by or consists of a binding agreement or legal instrument (e.g., enacted legislation, a signed treaty, the signed text of an agreement, or an executive action implementing such an agreement) that unambiguously creates a transfer of sovereignty, or primary or exclusive jurisdiction or control, even if this transfer or acquisition takes effect after the market deadline. Non-binding statements, negotiations, proposals, frameworks, or MOUs will not alone qualify. Basing rights, access agreements, SOFA-type arrangements, COFA-type arrangements, commercial concessions, or other permissions to use land (including leases) will not alone qualify. Any qualifying U.S. jurisdiction or control in Greenland that existed at market creation will not count as new qualifying control. Examples of qualifying events include but are not limited to treaty or piece of legislation that makes any portion of Greenland a U.S. territory or possession, even if the handover date for such territory or possession is later); or, a Guantánamo-style arrangement establishing a defined zone in Greenland under exclusive or primary U.S. jurisdiction and control, where Denmark and Greenland’s ordinary legal authority does not apply except by U.S. permission. The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the governments of the United States, Denmark, and Greenland; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Opinion

This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States acquires control of any land territory that is part of Greenland by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. Only the transfer of sovereignty, or the acquisition of primary or exclusive jurisdiction or control qualifies. 1. Transfer of Sovereignty: This will qualify if a binding agreement or legal instrument results in a defined area of Greenland coming under the formal sovereignty of the U.S. (e.g., incorporated as a U.S. state, territory, possession, or other U.S. political classification), even if the effective date occurs after the market deadline. 2. Acquisition of Primary or Exclusive Jurisdiction or Control: This will qualify if a binding agreement or legal instrument establishes a defined area in Greenland in which the U.S. has primary or exclusive jurisdiction or control over the territory, such that the ordinary legal authority of Denmark and Greenland do not apply,except by U.S. permission. Such agreements or instruments will qualify even if the effective date occurs after the market deadline. 3. Use of Force: If the U.S. acquires primary or exclusive jurisdiction or control over a defined area of Greenland through force, this will also qualify. An announcement will qualify only if it is accompanied by or consists of a binding agreement or legal instrument (e.g., enacted legislation, a signed treaty, the signed text of an agreement, or an executive action implementing such an agreement) that unambiguously creates a transfer of sovereignty, or primary or exclusive jurisdiction or control, even if this transfer or acquisition takes effect after the market deadline. Non-binding statements, negotiations, proposals, frameworks, or MOUs will not alone qualify. Basing rights, access agreements, SOFA-type arrangements, COFA-type arrangements, commercial concessions, or other permissions to use land (including leases) will not alone qualify. Any qualifying U.S. jurisdiction or control in Greenland that existed at market creation will not count as new qualifying control. Examples of qualifying events include but are not limited to treaty or piece of legislation that makes any portion of Greenland a U.S. territory or possession, even if the handover date for such territory or possession is later); or, a Guantánamo-style arrangement establishing a defined zone in Greenland under exclusive or primary U.S. jurisdiction and control, where Denmark and Greenland’s ordinary legal authority does not apply except by U.S. permission. The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the governments of the United States, Denmark, and Greenland; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket and Opinion, this market tracks the probability of the United States acquiring any part of Greenland by the end of 2026. The dashboard aggregates trading volume and implied probabilities from both platforms, offering a consensus view of this geopolitical possibility. Currently, combined volume across both venues exceeds $11,541,616, with $493 traded in the last 24 hours. This allows traders to see how sentiment shifts over time, and provides a comprehensive overview of the US-Greenland acquisition market. The current spread between the two platforms is 14.6.

Prediction market odds, like those found in this market, often provide a more accurate forecast than traditional polling. Polls capture stated preferences, while markets incentivize participants to reveal their *true* beliefs through financial stakes. While public opinion regarding a potential US acquisition of Greenland may be divided, this market reflects what traders are willing to bet on, offering a distinct signal. It’s important to note that prediction markets are forward-looking, incorporating information beyond simple approval ratings or survey responses. This can lead to significant differences between market probabilities and polling data.

Prices on Polymarket and Opinion can diverge due to several factors. Differences in user base, trading fees, and market-specific rules all contribute. Polymarket and Opinion can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Furthermore, each platform attracts traders with varying levels of expertise and access to information regarding US-Greenland relations. Currently, Polymarket currently favors Will the US acquire part of Greenland in 2026? at 3.3%, while Opinion leans toward Will the US acquire part of Greenland in 2026? at 17.8%. These discrepancies create arbitrage opportunities, which can eventually narrow the price gap, but short-term differences are common.

This market resolves around Jan 1, 2027, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. Resolution will depend on whether the United States government has legally acquired sovereignty over any portion of Greenland’s territory by that date. This includes formal treaties, purchases, or other legally recognized means of territorial acquisition. The outcome will be assessed based on publicly available information from official government sources and reputable news organizations, ensuring a transparent and verifiable result for this market.

Several events could significantly impact this market. A statement from the US President regarding Greenland, major diplomatic negotiations, or a shift in the Danish government’s stance on potential sales would all be key catalysts. Unexpected geopolitical developments, such as increased strategic competition in the Arctic region, could also influence trader sentiment. Furthermore, any credible reports of secret talks or internal US government discussions regarding an acquisition would likely cause substantial price movement in this market. Monitoring these signals will be crucial for understanding the evolving probabilities.